The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 2

News

Breaking Dawn - Part 2 officially grossed $141,067,634! The...
Gofobo Staff
11/19/2012 - 9:19pm
Q: So for four movies Bella’s contained, now she’s a tiger...
Gofobo Staff
11/16/2012 - 7:06pm

Twitter

    The astonishing conclusion to the series, THE TWILIGHT SAGA: BREAKING DAWN – PART 2, illuminates the secrets and mysteries of this spellbinding romantic epic that has entranced millions.

    Director: 
    Bill Condon
    Studio: 
    Summit Entertainment
    Release Date: 
    November 16, 2012
    Rating: 
    PG-13: Parents Strongly Cautioned
    Rating Warnings: 
    sequences of violence including disturbing images, some sensuality and partial nudity

    Videos

    Photos

    Breaking Dawn - Character Poster

    actor: Kristen Stewart
    movie: The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 2 2012

    Breaking Dawn - Character Poster

    actor: Robert Pattinson
    movie: The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 2 2012

    Breaking Dawn - Character Poster

    actor: Taylor Lautner
    movie: The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 2 2012

    The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 2

    movie: The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 2 2012

    Add Discussion Topic.
    PLEASE DO NOT POST ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION.

    Login or register to post a discussion

    current discussions

    gofobohumantristen's picture

    Twi-hards. I know you love everything in the Twilight universe. But if you HAD TO PICK something that bothered you about any of the films...what would it be? Sound off!

    Be sure to share your thoughts. Each week the best comment, as voted on by users, will receive a pair of passes to an upcoming screening! To cast your vote click on the thumbs up or thumbs down next to each comment.

    I wanted to see Bella end up with Jacob in the films, it would be a huge plot twist and I believe most fans awould've been pleased with that ending

    I loved them all. I thought it was a little awkward looking at the baby in the latest Breaking Dawn movie. It was a little too fake.

    I would say the special effects of how the vampires died during part 1. With all the money that they are making they could come up with something better then looking like glass breaking!!

    Where can I get some tickets?

    I would have burned the wig options for Alice and Esme Cullin in a couple of the movies. The make-up artists didn't even try to make them blend in. So were so obviously fake! I would have fired them on the spot during my first review.

    The one thing the really bothered me about ALL of the films was how fast they were filmed, I think they left out so many details from the books & it really felt like everything wasnt explained.

    I absolutely love the books and movies, but I think I would have to add the class in biology where they all have to prick their fingers to the beginning and at prom all the kids that awkwardly leave while Bella and Edward are dancing in the gazebo.... It's not that I would get rid of that or anything, but the way everyone walks away is just so awkward.

    Also as a technical thing... The camera work in New Moon when Bella is lost in the woods and the camera just spins down on her and also when she just sits in her room for months at a time. The camera work just makes me sick to my stomach watching the movie. My mom and I just close our eyes or fast forward through it because it is too much!

    I'd add the two scenes from the book where Edward kissed Bella and she fainted and the one where everyone had to prick their fingers in biology but Edward couldn't show up because of the blood.

    I would not change anything about the movies. I think that the actors they have got the rolls perfectly. And I know that you can not explain everything in a book.

    If I were to change anything it would be Bellas nightmares in new moon. In the Movie it was a little off from the way I read it in the books. I think that she could have done the scene different to really portray her nightmares and her feelings.

    Thumbs up

    (Sorry, My internet is not displaying the actual button to click)

    Ok. I didnt mean to repost that so many times. I am having So many internet problems right now!

    I hate the fact that it took so long to come out! I know some people love Rob but he is not that cute.

    I truly wish they would've done better casting with this movie, that is the only thing that truly puts me off with each film. The actors fall short every single film!

    Bella and Edward naming her Renesmee!!! Goog day,

    This isn't a film issue, but an issue you would have with the author.

    the one part I didn't like was in Breaking Dawn 1 and that was the way the wolves talked to each other at the logging sight. I really didn't care for that seen to much

    I agree. I couldn't help but laugh. It was a little ridiculous.

    I would have a different actor play Edward....I think Kellen Lutz would have even been a better Edward.

    I'm not sure who else they've could've gotten to play Bella but I haven't been to fond of Kristen Stewart's acting. If you look at the rest of her films her acting is basically the same even as a child.

    Completely agree. Kristen is unable to act when it comes to showing terror or reluctance. It's always the right arm bent at the elbow and the left arm reaching for her hair - always, always, always. Standing, sitting, dreaming, same painful motions. I know zero humans who do this. It is so forced, I find it painful to watch. When she begs the Voltaire for Edward's life, I literally cringe

    I think Megan Fox would have played a better Bella...

    Bella is such a wuss - waiting for her to finally kick some ass.

    nimase85's picture

    This was a great movie and even has enough action to keep the guys happy too

    nadiyah33's picture

    I loved all the rest .